I was displaying my pollen slides to kids around my place and one of them, all of 5 years, who measures everything with a scale asked , “How small are they?”. I mumbled my way through deftly, ignoring the question but it rang for a while in my head after. Measurement is an integral part of science and this was one aspect that I had conveniently ignored through this project. Could I create a digital scale that I could use over and over. I pulled out a stage micrometer that I had bought some time back. These cost about $11 on amazon , and their smallest division is 0.01 mm or 10 microns and they have a 100 divisions in total (Figure 1A). I have a Google phone that I measured has 4x digital zoom (Figure 1B).
Figure 1A and 1B For all my pollen pictures, I mostly use the 140x optical zoom and the 4x digital zoom, or on rare occasions the 400x optical zoom with a 4x digital zoom. This mean that if I create a template picture of the stage micrometer at these optical and digital magnifications, I shall have a scale that I can superimpose (using google picasa) and get an approximate size of the pollen or any object of study. First I needed to have pictures of the slide micrometer. Optical magnification No Digital zoom 4x Digital zoom 140x
400x
As long as I use the same digital and optical zoom on my sample and capture pictures with my Google phone, I can superimpose any picture with these scales using google picasa and measure distances knowing that each division is 10 microns. Wow this is exciting. I cant wait to wake up and tell the 5 year old that I know the size of the pollen. A few measurements of the different objects I have seen with the foldscope follow. If you see a logical error in my reasoning, let me know. Object and calculated measurement Image Spruce pollen – 50 microns
Magnolia pollen – 40 microns
Black locust pollen- 30 microns
Trichomes 120-170 microns
Male spider mite – ~110 microns
Honey-suckle pollen at 400x- 50 microns
Sign in to commentNobody has commented yet... Share your thoughts with the author and start the discussion!
More Posts from laksiyer
Halteria, the virovore
0 Applause0 Comments
2y
III. Understanding the earliest farmers: Secondary endosymbiosis, Matryoshka dolls
0 Applause0 Comments
2y
II. Understanding the earliest farmers: The vast diversity of algae.
0 Applause0 Comments
2y
Microbial conflict in action: The fascinating world of amoebae
0 Applause0 Comments
2y
My Dictyostelium story
0 Applause0 Comments
3y
I. Understanding the earliest farmers: The “crops”
0 Applause0 Comments
4y
A busy pond
0 Applause0 Comments
4y
The all-engulfing Sun: Experiments with the heliozoan Actinosphaerium
0 Applause0 Comments
5y
Culturing your favorite ciliate: Paramecium busaria
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Coleps: The Piraña of the ciliates
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Rheinberg illumination for Foldscope
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Ciliate motion: Saltation and its possible reversal in Cyclidium
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Tetrahymena thermophila mutants: Fat, Mouthless and Balloon
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Bdelloid rotifer development
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Games we play: Tetrahymena vs Chlamydomonas. Part 3 of series
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Dressing up protozoans (Vital Staining): Tetrahymena Vorax Part 2
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Polymorphism, cannibalism, epigenetics, and biological conflict: The many stories of Tetrahymena vorax – Part I
0 Applause0 Comments
6y
Imaging Tetrahymena thermophila cilia
0 Applause0 Comments
7y
A simple hack for reflection/epi-illumination using the foldscope
0 Applause0 Comments
7y
ASSETT and Foldscope: A marriage made in microcosmos heaven